Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wing v. Sedgwick

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 10, 1925No. 1787Published

1DissentAnderson, Circuit Judge

I think the ruling of the District Court was sound in law, and exactly applicable to the facts, now for the first time found. I do not undertake any adequate restatement of this unusually complicated case. Judge Morton’s opinion, on demurrer to the original declaration (244 F. 202), is the clearest and most adequate exposition I have anywhere found. This dissent should be read with that opinion. In general, I concur in Judge Morton’s view that the ease should have been. *180determined for the defendant on the pleadings — that the plaintiff stated no ease. But, even if wrong in that view, now that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keith v. KilmerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1919
  2. Wing v. SedgwickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1918
  3. Keith v. KilmerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1921
  4. Wing v. McCallumDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API