Legal Opinion
Sogg v. Director, 06ap-883 (6-21-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 21, 2007No. 06AP-883PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, the Ohio Department of Commerce ("appellant"), appeals the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas denying its motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee Wilton S. Sogg ("appellee").
{¶ 2} At issue in this litigation is Ohio's Unclaimed Funds Act codified in R.C. 169.01 et seq. On August 3, 2004, appellee filed a class-action complaint in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas seeking a declaration that appellant's retention of interest earned on unclaimed funds pursuant to R.C. 169.08(D) violates…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Phillips v. Washington Legal FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Brown v. Legal Foundation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Coventry Township v. EckerOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sogg v. ZurzOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Sogg v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Sogg v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2008