Haslip v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Pee, CueiaM.
It appears that the appellant was indicted in the County Court of Franklin; and the indictment charged that the appellant, on the 6th of February, 1817, at, &c.., in, &c., with force and arms, an assault did make on the body of Michael Spencer, and then did beat, bruise, and ill-treat the said Michael, and then and there did bite and disable the little finger of the right hand of him, the said Michael, with intent to maim and disfigure the said Michael, contrary to the act of Assembly in such case made and provided, and against the peace and, dignity of the State. To this…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Huffman v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
- Profilet v. Hall & HildrethSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859
- Mowers v. FethersNew York Supreme Court · 1871
- Huffman v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1956