Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ethel C. Hale and W. Paul Wharton v. Federal Communications Commission, Ksl, Incorporated, Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 16, 1970No. 22751_1Published

1ConcurrenceTamm, Circuit Judge

Today I cast my vote with the majority solely because the Federal Communications Commission is currently undertaking a comprehensive review of its doctrines governing concentration of control in the mass media; cf. Pikes Peak Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 137 U.S. App.D.C. 234, 243-244, 422 F.2d 671, 680-681, cert. denied, 395 U.S. 979, 89 S.Ct. 2134, 23 L.Ed.2d 767 (1969). Absent this single, crucial fact, I would find serious obstacles to affirming the Commission’s action in this case.

The general question of what impact the antitrust laws should have upon an administrative agency’s licensing and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. United States v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API