Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Osborn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 10, 1911No. 712PublishedCited by 5 opinions

.Error from District Court, Pontotoc County; Joel Terrell, Judge. Action by John R. Osborn against George A. Harrison and others. From a judgment in favor of. plaintiff, defendants bring •error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

On January 28, 1908, John R. Osborn, defendant in error, sued Geo. A. Harrison, J. W. Bolen, and John P. Crawford, plaintiffs in error, in the county court of Pontotoc county to recover a sum certain on a written obligation. His petition substantially states: That on September 28, 1907, said Crawford and Bolen as principals, and said Harrison as surety, made, executed, and delivered to one C. P. Cooper their certain undertaking as follows:

“We undertake and are bound unto C. P. Cooper in the sum of $750.00 conditioned that we will deliver to him unincumbered possession of the lands this day…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. GreenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1854
  2. Gann v. BallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Hewetson v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Kelley v. SeaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  5. Nevill v. HancockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1855

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Midwest Refining Co. v. GeorgeWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
  2. In Re the Estate of PughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. Allen v. Ouachita Marine & Industrial Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Burba v. BurbaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  5. White v. Oklahoma Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API