Legal Opinion

Dahlman v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1990No. S013082PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

We review the recommendation of the Review Department of the State Bar Court of California (review department) that petitioner Joseph D. Dahlman (petitioner) be disbarred and required to comply with rule 955, California Rules of Court for his failure to comply with the provisions of our order of March 23, 1988, requiring him to file an affidavit under rule 955. After reviewing the entire record and petitioner’s contentions, we adopt the recommendation of the review department.

Facts and Proceedings Below

The findings of fact of the Hearing Department of the State Bar Court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re KreamerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Greenbaum v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In Re SeveroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In Re ChiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Acco Engineered Sys., Inc. v. Contractors' State License Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Acco Engineered Systems v. Contractors' St. License Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API