Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Farrar

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided February 10, 1988No. ACM S27611PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

On 15 October 1986, the appellant was selected for random urinalysis testing which confirmed the presence of benzoylecognine metabolites in her urine. Expert testimony established that only cocaine produces benzoylecognine. She denied using cocaine at any time during her military career and did not associate with people who used cocaine. Additionally, she presented testimonial and documentary evidence as to her good military character and reputation for truthfulness. She had no explanation for the test results.

I

Evidence that an accused is truthful and possesses…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. United States v. HarperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. FordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. MurphyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. JetteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. JonesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. FarrarUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. MICHAEL EDWARDS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  4. United States v. BirbeckU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. SuttonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API