Legal Opinion
Harjo v. Kunkle
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 24, 1921No. 160PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Argued January 20, 1921. Decided January 24, 1921. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon authority of Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184; Berkman v. United States, 250 U. S. 114, 118; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193. Mr. Lewis C. Lawson for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Farrell v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Goodrich v. FerrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Sugarman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Toop v. Ulysses Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Public Motor Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938