Fortis Bank (Nederland) N v. v. M/V Shamrock
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
Order on Motions for Summary Judgment
SINGAL, Chief Judge.
Before the Court are Plaintiff Fortis Bank’s (“Fortis”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 286), Intervenor Plaintiff Republic of France Establishment National Des Invalides Del La Marine’s (“ENIM”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 353) and Plaintiff Fortis’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 372), which Fortis filed in response to ENIM’s Motion.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
In deciding all of these pending motions for summary judgment, the Court applies the same basic standard. Generally, a party is entitled to summary judgment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Navarro Pomares v. Pfizer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Ward v. Massachusetts Health Research Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- New York Dock Co. v. Steamship PoznanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Payne v. SS Tropic BreezeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- LPUSA, LLC v. Wheelz Up Garage, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2024