Legal Opinion

Fortis Bank (Nederland) N v. v. M/V Shamrock

District Court, D. Maine

Decided July 29, 2005No. 04-CV-147-GZSPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order on Motions for Summary Judgment

SINGAL, Chief Judge.

Before the Court are Plaintiff Fortis Bank’s (“Fortis”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 286), Intervenor Plaintiff Republic of France Establishment National Des Invalides Del La Marine’s (“ENIM”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 353) and Plaintiff Fortis’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 372), which Fortis filed in response to ENIM’s Motion.

I. STANDARD OF REVIEW

In deciding all of these pending motions for summary judgment, the Court applies the same basic standard. Generally, a party is entitled to summary judgment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. Navarro Pomares v. Pfizer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  3. Ward v. Massachusetts Health Research Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  4. New York Dock Co. v. Steamship PoznanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Payne v. SS Tropic BreezeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. LPUSA, LLC v. Wheelz Up Garage, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API