Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel., Ehmann v. Schneider

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1946No. 6629PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By THE COURT:

In this original action in this court, the relator seeks a writ of prohibition-restraining the respondent from vacating a judgment entered by him at a prior term of the Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton county.

No answer has been filed, but the respondent appeared personally and stated that he had concluded that he had exceeded his jurisdiction in entering the judgment, and, for that reason, would, on his own motion, vacate it unless prohibited by this Court. He submitted the matter to this Court for its decision.

From the position and representations of relator and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gregg v. KentOhio Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vanstone v. VanstoneOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Gillam v. GillamOhio Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Gillam v. GillamOhio Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Motor Insurance v. BurnsOhio Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. VanStone v. VanStoneOhio Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API