Adams v. Goodrich
Supreme Court of Georgia
Laborer’s lien. Mechanic. Before Joseph' Ganahl, Esq., Judge pro hac vice. Richmond Superior Gourt. April Term, 1875. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Warner, Chief Justice.
This was a proceeding to foreclose a laborer’s lien under the provisions of the 1974th section of the Code. It appears from the affidavit of the plaintiff and the evidence in the record, that he is a laborer and mechanic, that he was employed by the defendant, who was a contractor and builder, to work for him at $2 25 per day, payable weekly, and that defendant was indebted to him $48 95, for manual labor performed by him in sawing and dressing lumber, etc. The court charged the jury, “that the plaintiff, Adams, was a mechanic, and not such a laborer as was entitled to a…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Moore-Mansfield Construction Co v. Indianapolis, Newcastle & Toledo Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Indianapolis Northern Traction Co. v. BrennanIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Delaware River Quarry & Construction Co. v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
- Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Wager v. Carrollton BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.