Hopfensack v. Hopfensack
New York Court of Common Pleas
Appeal by defendants Ernst Hopfensaok and Louis W. Heaba from an order of the special term directing, among other things, that the appellants deliver to the receiver herein the property of which they dispossessed the receiver on the 11th day of September, 1879, and that the fees, allowances and dues of the receiver be paid out of such property.
1Opinion of the Court
In this action for a dissolution and- accounting, and for the appointment of a receiver, the appellants were joined as defendants in order to dispose of their title or claim to the property so conveyed. A receiver of that copartnership property was appointed pendente lite on plaintiff’s motion; he took the property in dispute from these appellants at their place of business.
The appellants petitioned the court to be examined pro imteresse suo, and to have the property restored.
They were so examined, but their application for restoration of the property was denied and the issues in the action…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Knickerbocker v. McKindley Coal & Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Makeel v. HotchkissIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Cutter v. PollockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Brock v. RudigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Heise v. StarrAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.