Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Tilley v. Ford

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Original Action by Quo Warranto. Cited in a lengthy printed argument the following authorities: Laws of Mo. 1883, p. 59 ; State v. Stone-street, 12 S. W. Rep. 895 ; R. S. 1879, sec. 5838; And. Diet.

Read the full summary

Original Action by Quo Warranto. Cited in a lengthy printed argument the following authorities: Laws of Mo. 1883, p. 59 ; State v. Stone-street, 12 S. W. Rep. 895 ; R. S. 1879, sec. 5838; And. Diet. Law.' 1023; People v. Brundage, 78 N. Y. 403, 407; R. S., sec. 3126 ; Balter v. Kirie, 33 Ind. 517; Haight v. Love, 39 N. J. Law, 476 ; State v. St. Louis, 90 Mo. 19 ; Marbury v. Madison, 1 Craneh, 162 ; Const., art. 2, sec. 22; art. 6, sec. 22; Ex Parte Slater, 72 Mo. 102 ; In re McDonald, 19 Mo. App. 370 ; Const., art 6, sec. 28.; Laws of 1879, p. 80 ; In re Tuller, 79 111. 99, 107 ; State v.…

1Opinion of the CourtGill, J.

This is a proceeding by quo warranto to test the title of the defendant to the office of official stenographer of Buchanan county circuit court, division number 2. The defendant, by a general demurrer to the information, has put in issue the merits of his claim to that office. It seems to be conceded that the relator’s case is well stated in the information. The facts, so far as necessary to the determination of the questions raised by the demurrer, are as follows : At the general election in 1886, O. M. Spencer was elected judge of the twelfth judicial circuit of Missouri, which, at that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  2. Wilcox v. RodmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. LaRue v. HitchcockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. State ex inf. Major v. McKaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API