Legal Opinion

Daugherty v. Wheeler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1890No. 14,390PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the FultoD Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

— The only question involved in this appeal is whether or not the right of action is barred by the six years’ statute of limitations. .

The facts are, that prior to the 12th day of September, 1877, Sydney Keith had become bound as surety for Ephraim Daugherty, the debt had fallen due, and a judgment had been recovered against both principal and surety in the Fulton Circuit Court. Daugherty’s land had previously been sold for delinquent taxes, and some of it had been sold on execution, the time for redemption not yet having expired, and in order to save himself, Keith, with the knowledge and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Palmer v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. High v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Neyland v. BendyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Burlingame TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  5. Post v. LoseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gossard v. GossardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  2. Parks v. SatterthwaiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Shapleigh Hardware Co. v. SpiroMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Barer v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  5. Houser v. Ohio Historical SocietyOhio Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API