Legal Opinion

Bowes v. Industrial Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 10, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit, on a bill of exchange. Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Jambs Goggin, Judge, presiding. Submitted at the October term, 1894.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

At the foundation of this suit is an instrument as follows: “$500. Ho. 4,794.

Chicago, June 17th, 1892.

To E. J. Bowes, Jr., & Bros.:

This is to certify that Empire Building Co., contractor for the entire work of your building, Ho. — Fulton street, is entitled to a payment of five hundred dollars..

Contract. $7,850. by the terms of the contract.

Extra work. Remarks.

Deductions.

Total.

Previous issues, $6,325.

Present issue, 500 $6,925.

Balance, ' $925.

Wilson & Marble,

(Indorsed) By A. H. Dood.

Peabody, Houghteling & Co.,

Pay to the order of Empire Building Co.

John R. Bowes.

Pay to the order of Industrial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Montelius v. CharlesIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Van Staphorst v. PearceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  3. Leonard v. MasonNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  4. Peoria & Oquawka Rail Road v. NeillIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  5. People v. HansonIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowes v. Industrial Bank of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API