Legal Opinion

Gan Seow Tung v. Carusi

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 20, 1947No. Civ. No. 6528PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, District Judge.

The defendant’s motion to dismiss on the ground that Section 503 of the Nationality Act of 1940, 8 U.S.C.A. § 903, is not available to plaintiff, is not well taken. The statute is a special statute, and is plain and clear in its terms. It can be given effect without an implied repeal of the exclusion acts or the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2201, 2202, or any other statutes called to my attention in the brief of the Government. While it may give the courts greater latitude of review than a Writ of Habeas Corpus, it provides no more of a dual system than…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lee Hong v. AchesonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
  2. In Re CarlsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1968
  3. Rossello v. MarshallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  4. Reyes v. NeellyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  5. Gan Seow Tung v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API