Commonwealth v. Parker
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtBender, J.
¶ 1 Maurice Parker (Appellant) appeals from the April 29, 2004 judgment of sentence imposed upon him following his conviction for attempted murder, aggravated assault, violations of the Uniform Firearms Act, and possessing an instrument of crime. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in permitting, over a defense objection, the prosecutor to display a handgun in his opening statement.1 We conclude that although the trial court abused its discretion, the resulting error was harmless. We do, however, caution against the use of such tactics by prosecutors in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WidmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Coker v. SM Flickinger Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Daset Mining Corp. v. Industrial Fuels Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Parr, J. v. Ford Motor CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. ParkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Klein v. AronchickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Lykes v. YatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Smith v. MorrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.