Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Reynolds

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided April 10, 2008No. Miscellaneous H-07-0699PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SIM LAKE, District Judge.

Pending before the court is the application of the United States to medicate involuntarily David Russell Reynolds in an effort to restore his competence to stand trial. For the reasons explained below the United States’ application will be denied.

I. Factual and Procedural History

On April 2, 2007, Reynolds was charged by Criminal Complaint with making felonious threats against a federal judge. 1 He was arrested, detained as a continuing threat, and ordered to have a psychiatric examination to determine his competence to stand trial. On June…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Colorado v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. Herbert G. Evans, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Aaron GomesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Susan JamesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. RixDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API