Legal Opinion
Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp. v. Feeney
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 30, 1990No. 89-386Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
495 U.S. 299 (1990)
PORT AUTHORITY TRANS-HUDSON CORP.
v.
FEENEY
No. 89-386.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued February 26, 1990
Decided April 30, 1990[*]
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Joseph Lesser argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Arthur P. Berg, Anne M. Tannenbaum, and Carlene V. McIntyre.
Richard W. Miller argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Peter M. J. Reilly.[]
2Opinion of the Court · O'ConnorJustice O'Connor
These cases call upon the Court to determine whether the Eleventh Amendment bars respondents' suits in federal court against an entity created…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
3Cases cited39 opinions
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.