Legal Opinion

Pacific Employers Ins. Co. v. Barnett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 28, 1950No. 15134PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

Appellee Barnett, plaintiff in the trial court, recovered judgment on a favorable jury verdict for one hundred weeks workmen’s compensation benefits for the loss of an eye. Art. 8306, sec. 12, Vernon’s R.C.S. Appellant, the insurance carrier, presents the contentions herein discussed under ten points of error.

It is first argued that there is no evidence, or, under an alternative point, that the evidence is insufficient, to support the claim that the loss of vision in the eye was caused by the alleged accidental injury.

Appellee testified that he was engaged on the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Texas Indemnity InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Lottman v. CuillaTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Pacific Employers Ins. Co. v. GageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  4. Stewart v. ShoemakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Hodges v. AlfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Argonaut Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Atlantic Pipe Line Co. v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. MendenhallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. Alamo Motor Lines, Inc. v. MaldonadoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Box v. Au Forgeron de la Cour-Dieu, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API