Legal Opinion

Cosgrove v. Lansing Board of Education

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 1987No. Docket No. 85937Published

1Per curiam

FACTS

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from an order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(4) on the ground that the circuit court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction in this case.

Plaintiffs comprise a group of fifteen teachers employed by the Lansing School District. When the defendant union was organizing in 1972, it included a grandfather clause in its collective bargaining agreement that exempted plaintiffs from paying dues or an equivalent service fee to the union. In 1984, the defendant union and employer did not include that clause in its renegotiated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Demings v. City of EcorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. J D Candler Roofing Co. v. DicksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Smith v. Motorland InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Smith v. Lansing School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API