Legal Opinion

Davis v. National Lumber Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1913No. Civ. No. 1301PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action to recover the value, of two horses and one mule alleged to have been delivered by plaintiff to defendant as bailee. Plaintiff had judgment for the value of the mule. The appeal is from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The court found that plaintiff delivered to defendant, for its use and benefit, the two horses and mule upon agreement that defendant would care for the same and return them to plaintiff on demand; that plaintiff made such demand and defendant neglected and failed to comply therewith for the reason that the two horses were, without defendant’s fault or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fay v. Steamer New WorldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1850

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Brent L. Sellick v. Clipper Yacht Company, a Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  3. People v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. People v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API