Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Alpizar v. Total Image Beauty Salon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 31, 1995No. 93-640Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMiner, Judge

The JCC denied the claim for temporary total disability or temporary partial disability benefits from March 14, 1991, through April 29, 1991, on the ground that “there is no medical evidence to substantiate her entitlement.” I would reverse this portion of the JCC’s order because such an explanation is legally insufficient to support the denial of benefits.

Claimant was injured on February 14, 1991, when she slipped in a puddle of water while working as a manicurist and pedicurist. Claimant was unable to work for about three weeks after her accident. Dr. Sanchez-Lopez opined that claimant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams Roofing, Inc. v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Philpot v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Glades Correctional Inst. v. BukowskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Hulbert v. Avis Rent-A-Car SystemsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Davis v. BROWARD COUNTY HEALTH DEPT.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API