Legal Opinion
Grossman v. BANCO INDUS. DE VENEZUELA
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 15, 1988No. 88-571PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
534 So.2d 773 (1988)
Harry GROSSMAN, Appellant,
v.
BANCO INDUSTRIAL de VENEZUELA, C.A., Miami Agency, Appellee.
No. 88-571.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
November 15, 1988.
Rehearing Denied December 20, 1988.
Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Mallory Horton, Miami, for appellant.
Richey & Munroe and Jonathan Goodman and Juan J. Rodriguez, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
SCWARTZ, Chief Judge.
We affirm the judgment below upon the holding that, as a matter of law, the maker of a note is precluded by the parol evidence rule from successfully…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Linear Corp. v. Standard Hardware Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Schwartz v. ZaconickSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Forbes v. Fort Lauderdale Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1922
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. E.B. Rood, A/K/A Ed Rood, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Payne v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Intercontinental Investment Bankers, Inc. v. First Union National Bank of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Sandoval v. CollDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Sunflower Bazaar, Inc. v. Florida First International BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992