Legal Opinion

Martin v. Ficklin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1950PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDew, J.

The respondent, owner of a grocery store in Moberly, Missouri, brought this action to recover $1000, represented' by the check of the appellant in that amount alleged, to have been given by appellant as earnest money and as part payment on a contract to purchase the store and merchandise therein, on which check appellant stopped payment and, it is claimed, repudiated the purchase contract. Punitive damages were also sought by the petition, but not submitted to the jury. Judgment was for the plaintiff for $1000, with interest. The defendant appealed.

The respondent and the appellant will, for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Petty v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. DobbinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Montgomery v. WiseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Coffman v. FlemingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  5. Armstrong v. DunnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Parker v. ShermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  2. UAW-CIO Local 31 Credit Union v. Royal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. Montgomery v. PetrusMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. State v. HardinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Norman Schuman Interiors, Inc. v. SacksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API