Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Brown v. Com., State Bd. of Pharmacy

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 1989No. 2891 C.D. 1988Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDoyle, Judge

I agree with the majority opinion insofar as it concludes that one possesses a property right in a suspended license. I dissent, however, from that portion of the opinion which concludes that there has been an impermissible retroactive application of the pertinent statute to Petitioner’s case.

The Board held that Petitioner could not apply for reinstatement until ten years after his conviction date. It based its determination on the ten-year limitation appearing in Section 5(d) of the Pharmacy Act,1 63 P.S. § 390-5(d), which Section, as noted by the majority, did not become effective until…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Galena v. PA. DEPT. OF STATECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Crisante v. J. H. Beers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Morris v. PA. ST. BD. OF PHARMACYCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Bortulin v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Lang v. County of DelawareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API