Brown v. Com., State Bd. of Pharmacy
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDoyle, Judge
I agree with the majority opinion insofar as it concludes that one possesses a property right in a suspended license. I dissent, however, from that portion of the opinion which concludes that there has been an impermissible retroactive application of the pertinent statute to Petitioner’s case.
The Board held that Petitioner could not apply for reinstatement until ten years after his conviction date. It based its determination on the ten-year limitation appearing in Section 5(d) of the Pharmacy Act,1 63 P.S. § 390-5(d), which Section, as noted by the majority, did not become effective until…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Galena v. PA. DEPT. OF STATECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Crisante v. J. H. Beers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Morris v. PA. ST. BD. OF PHARMACYCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Bortulin v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Lang v. County of DelawareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985