Legal Opinion · Dissent

Maloney v. Cline

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1997No. 49A02-9610-CV-679Published

1DissentSullivan, Judge

The Marion County Rules of Practice and Procedure, insofar as here concerned, and more particularly Rule 18 governing appeals from The Marion County Small Claims Courts, did not become effective until March 1, 1996. Until that time, such appeals were taken to the Marion Municipal Courts and were governed by the rules attributable to those courts. Rule 19(A) of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Civil Divisions of the Municipal Court of Marion County provided that cases coming from the Small Claims Courts “shall be considered at issue when received without the filing of an answer, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Dunkirk Water & Sewage Dept. v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Matter of Public Law No. 305 and Public Law No. 309Indiana Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Mullis v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Strube v. SumnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API