Legal Opinion

McBee v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 11, 1931No. 13867Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The testimony of Bratton, while qualified as to the identity of the seller, is certain to the point that he acquired the liquor from the man who Bratton took to be the appellant. Bratton’s testimony, as understood, may be summarized as follows: He and Lang went to the domicile of Lemons to get whisky. McBee was seen but Lemons was not. Upon being informed that Bratton and Lang wanted to buy whisky, McBee said he had none. Some one called McBee and he started toward the house. After a few minutes he returned and said to Bratton and Lang, “Come on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Vyvial v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Cade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Hickox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Asher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API