Legal Opinion

Kewitsch v. Beer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 9, 1926No. 25,178Published

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action by Kewitsch against Beer for the dissolution of a partnership and an accounting. Defendant Scheffert was impleaded because under an executory contract he had purchased Beer’s interest in the firm. The findings and order for judgment were against Beer, both upon the issues between him and plaintiff and those between him and his impleaded codefendant, Scheffert. The latter phase of the case is the only one brought here for review by this appeal of defendant Beer from the order denying his motion for amended findings or a new trial.

The decision went for Scheffert on his cross-complaint…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Exchange Bank v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API