Legal Opinion

State v. Osier

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2017No. 20170041, No. 20170042PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] Mark Osier appeals from a district court order denying his motion for relief from the judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Osier argues that the district court erred by failing to grant relief on the merits and by failing to provide adequate written findings of fact or an explanation for its decision. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Osier’s motion for relief, nor did it err in providing sufficient findings of fact or conclusions of law. See Gonzalez v. State, 2017 ND 109, ¶ 11, 893 N.W.2d 473 (stating that although the district court’s order is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gonzalez v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Osier and Osier v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API