Legal Opinion

Frisbie v. Rosenberg Bros. & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1909No. Civ. No. 631PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Shasta County, and from an order denying a new trial. Charles M. Head, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The action is for damages for defendant’s refusal to comply with its agreement to pay for certain dried fruit sold to it by plaintiff.

On September 4, 1906, the parties entered into a written contract providing that “Rosenberg Bros. & Co. have this day bought of S. H. Frisbie and said seller has this day sold to said buyer the entire crop of pears estimated at fifteen tons now growing and grown on the orchard situate—Anderson—■ of which orchard- is the owner and of which said crop seller declares that he is the owner and represents that he is duly authorized to sell the whole thereof.

“Prices…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cheda v. KockosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API