Nutting v. Hulbert & Muffly, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WARNE, J. pro tem. * —This
is an appeal from the judgment in favor of respondents concerning a disputed boundary line.
Plaintiff, the record owner of Lots 2, 3 and 4 of Section 31 in Township 12 North, Range 12 West, M.D.M., in Mendocino County, brought suit to enjoin a trespass upon certain portions of said lands by the defendants. Defendants and cross-complainants denied the alleged trespass and by way of cross-complaint alleged that they were the owners of the land on which the plaintiff claimed the trespass occurred. The trial court found for the defendants and cross-complainants and also…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sneed v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Mello v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Martin v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Madera School District v. MaggioriniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
3Cited by2 opinions
- Janes v. LeDeitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Ball v. HarderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959