Legal Opinion

Nutting v. Hulbert & Muffly, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 22, 1957No. Civ. 9206PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARNE, J. pro tem. * —This

is an appeal from the judgment in favor of respondents concerning a disputed boundary line.

Plaintiff, the record owner of Lots 2, 3 and 4 of Section 31 in Township 12 North, Range 12 West, M.D.M., in Mendocino County, brought suit to enjoin a trespass upon certain portions of said lands by the defendants. Defendants and cross-complainants denied the alleged trespass and by way of cross-complaint alleged that they were the owners of the land on which the plaintiff claimed the trespass occurred. The trial court found for the defendants and cross-complainants and also…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sneed v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Mello v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Martin v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Madera School District v. MaggioriniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Janes v. LeDeitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Ball v. HarderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API