Legal Opinion

Ronald v. Young, Admr.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1963No. 25970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkeel, J.

This appeal comes to this court on questions of law from a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury finding “that the plaintiff is entitled to participate in the workmen’s compensation fund of the state of Ohio. ’ ’

The defendant-appellant, The Warner & Swasey Company, was plaintiff-appellee’s employer and is a self-insurer under the provisions of Section 4123.35, Revised Code, a part of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. When demand for compensation was made by the claimant and refused for the reason that his employer determined that he had not been injured in the course of his employment, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pickering v. PeskindOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Steiger v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sutton v. National Distillers Products Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1978
  2. Woelfling v. Great-West Life Assurance Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Dillow v. YoungOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Woelfling v. Great-West Life Assurance Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API