Legal Opinion

Mingo v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 20, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Caesar Cirigliano, J.), entered November 30, 2001, which, inter alia, entitled plaintiff to recover damages from defendant upon a jury verdict awarding her $400,000 for past pain and suffering and $1.5 million for future pain and suffering, unanimously modified, on the facts, to vacate the award for future pain and suffering and remand for a new trial solely upon the issue of damages for future pain and suffering, and otherwise affirmed, without costs, unless, within 30 days of service of a copy of this order with notice of entry, plaintiff stipulates to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ruskin v. SafirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Rountree v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Cano v. BLF Realty Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vaz v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API