Legal Opinion

State v. Curry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 3, 2019No. A160845PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, P. J.

*9*379Faced with criminal charges, defendant, who is black, opted to exercise his state and federal constitutional rights to a jury trial. Among those summoned as potential jurors for defendant's case were three college students home for the summer. Each was passed for cause-that is, determined to be capable of deciding this case fairly and impartially in accordance with the law. Robert and Sarah, who are white, were empaneled as jurors. Fitsum, who is black-and the sole African-American in the jury pool that day-was not empaneled after the prosecutor exercised a peremptory strike against him…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Allyn Akeem SmithArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. CurryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. VandykeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. Curry v. County of WashingtonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022
  5. Curry v. ReyesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API