Legal Opinion

Chemical Bank v. Washington Public Power Supply System

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1984No. 49868-7Published

1Opinion of the Court

102 Wn.2d 874 (1984)

691 P.2d 524

CHEMICAL BANK, Appellant,

v.

WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM, Appellant, PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL, Respondents.

No. 49868-7.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

November 6, 1984.

Betts, Patterson & Mines, P.S., by Michael Mines (Robert F. Mullen, Ralph L. McAfee, Richard S. Simmons, and Cravath, Swaine & Moore, of counsel), for appellant Chemical Bank.

Culp, Dwyer, Guterson & Grader, by Richard C. Yarmuth, Michele Coad, Robert O. Marritz, and Earle J. Hereford, Jr., for appellant Washington Public Power Supply System.

Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell,…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Gelpcke v. DubuqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  5. Dixon County v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API