Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Associated Billposters & Distributors of United States & Canada

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 2, 1925No. 106Published

1Opinion of the Court

6 F.2d 1000 (1925)

SULLIVAN

v.

ASSOCIATED BILLPOSTERS AND DISTRIBUTORS OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA et al.

No. 106.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 2, 1925.

Abraham Benedict and Gustavus A. Rogers, both of New York City, for plaintiff in error.

Geller, Rolston & Blanc, of New York City (George S. Mittendorf and Clinton C. Swan, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendants in error.

Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.

ROGERS, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The question which is now presented to this court is simply whether it was error for the…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API