Legal Opinion

In Re Barnes

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 28, 1932No. Docket No. 2295PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[1] Petitioner is in custody under an alleged conviction on a criminal charge before a justice of the peace, petitioner's contention being that the docket of the justice fails to show that petitioner had a trial before the judgment of conviction was rendered.

At the oral argument respondent was permitted to file an amended return to the writ, by which it was shown that since the issuance of the writ the justice had corrected the docket to show that a trial actually occurred. Petitioner contends that a justice of the peace may not amend his docket at such a stage. This contention cannot be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re GlavichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re MizeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. In Re RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API