Armstrong v. State
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.
Appellant was convicted upon a charge of the possession of intoxicating liquors. The evidence, upon which the conviction rests, was obtained by officers in the course of the execution of a search warrant. We will discuss briefly two contentions made by appellant in respect to that warrant, and, first, that it was invalid because issued on Sunday.
The fact that a search warrant is issued on Sunday does not render it invalid, unless expressly prohibited by statutory enactment. 47 Am. Jur., p. 520, par. 30. There is no such prohibition in any of our statutes. The question was considered in State…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Tucker v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
- Mai v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. ConwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. AlfinitoNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Stringer v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. AnselmoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- People v. ChildersNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- Robb v. WardMississippi Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.