Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Quinn

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1930No. 2912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

The respondent made concurrently several motions in this case. One is to require the appellant to complete the transcript of the testimony taken in the case so as to include matter alleged not to have been embraced in the bill of exceptions, and to embody in the record all the pleadings. This motion is based upon the contention that the record on appeal does not fully or accurately state the proceedings.

Counsel also move to strike from the files the bill of exceptions on file, together with the transcript of the record on appeal and all other papers except the judgment roll, for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peri v. JeffersNevada Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State v. WarrenNevada Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Miller v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Chessman v. Hillhouse, SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nevada Transfer & Warehouse Co. v. PetersonNevada Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Lovelock Lands Inc. v. Lovelock Land & Development Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1931
  3. City of Fallon v. Churchill County Bank Mortgage Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API