Legal Opinion

Stadler v. Barnhart

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided December 11, 2006No. 03-CV-6448LPublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) to review the final determination of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“the Commissioner”) that Michael Stadler (“plaintiff”) is not disabled, and, therefore, is not entitled to benefits under the Social Security Act (“the Act”). Plaintiff applied for Supplemental Security Income benefits and disability insurance benefits on November 18 and December 16, 1999 respectively, alleging a disability onset date of July 20, 1998. (T. 90, 306). 1 Plaintiff asserted that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. David Rutherford v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. Albert Shaw v. Shirley S. Chater, as Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Borsching v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015
  2. Almanzar v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
  3. Austin v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023
  4. Barker v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
  5. Benoit v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API