Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Anderson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 18, 1986PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The defendant, convicted of murder in the first degree of his wife, contends that, because he was denied his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel, he is entitled to a new trial. Through new counsel on appeal, he argues that his trial counsel failed to present helpful expert testimony concerning his state of mind at the time he stabbed his wife to death. We consider this claim and, acknowledging our duties under G. L. c. 278, § 33E (1984 ed.), affirm the judgment.

About 4 a.m. on My 27, 1983, in Worcester the defendant forced his way into the second-floor apartment of his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. SatterfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. WaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bruce Anderson v. Norman ButlerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. NardoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. DeCiccoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. HensleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  5. Care & Protection of GeorgetteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API