Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Shaun Chapman

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 4, 2017No. 16-1810Published

1ConcurrenceJordan, Circuit Judge

I agree with the well-reasoned opinion of my colleagues in this case but write separately to express dismay at the ever-expanding application of the categorical approach. Recently, our Court was asked to apply the categorical approach to contemporaneous convictions obtained in a jury trial over which the sentencing judge himself had presided. United States v. Robinson, 844 F.3d 137, 141 (3d Cir. 2016). Although we declined, id,, that request indicates the kudzu quality of the categorical approach, which seems to be always enlarging its territory. This case does not present a novel expansion…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. United States v. Kareem DoctorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API