Legal Opinion
United States v. Jose Orlando Lopez, (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 17, 1993No. 91-10274, 91-10393PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POOLE, Circuit Judge:
I
Jose Lopez was indicted for conspiracy to distribute and distribution of cocaine and heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 & 841(a)(1), and for aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2. While awaiting trial, Lopez was detained with a codefend-ant, Antonio Escobedo, at the Federal Correctional Institution at Pleasanton.
Lopez retained attorney Barry Tarlow to represent him. Tarlow informed Lopez that he believed that the defendants had a viable entrapment defense and that, in any case, it was his general policy not to negotiate a plea with the government in…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. John Woodley, United States of America v. John WoodleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- New York State Bar Ass'n v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- US Ex Rel. O'Keefe v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997
- Gonzales v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.