Legal Opinion

Mr. B's, Inc. v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 28, 1998No. 1—97—2149, 1—97—2279 consPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Quinn

The instant appeal is brought under Supreme Court Rule 301 (155 Ill. 2d R. 301) from a grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees in plaintiffs-appellants’ action for declaratory and injunctive relief, holding that the City of Chicago’s amended amusement tax ordinance is constitutional. In an order dated August 27, 1997, we granted appellants’ motion to consolidate the appeal under docket number 1 — 97—2279 with an earlier appeal under docket number 1 — 97—2149, which was premature as the circuit court had not yet rendered final judgment.

The amended amusement tax ordinance at…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Commercial National Bank of Chicago v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Mulligan v. DunneIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. S. Bloom, Inc. v. KorshakIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Illinois Gasoline Dealers Ass'n v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. StubHub, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2011
  2. City of Chicago v. Stubhub!, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. City of Boulder v. Leanin' Tree, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  4. DeWoskin v. Loew's Chicago Cinema, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. American Beverage Ass'n v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API