Legal Opinion

Charles E. Sorensen v. The Overland Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 5, 1957No. 12035_1PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered for defendant under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b), 28 U.S.C. The action is in federal court by diversity only and Delaware law governs. The case was presented with competence to this Court and all the points raised were thoroughly analyzed and considered by the district judge. 142 F.Supp. 354, D. C.D.Del.1956. We agree with the district judge and our opinion can do little more than put in our own words what he himself has already adequately written.

Plaintiff Sorensen sues the defendant Overland Corporation for counsel fees paid to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sorensen v. the Overland CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1956
  2. Mooney v. Willys-Overland Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Stifel Financial Corp. v. CochranSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  2. Syed v. Hercules Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. Nancy Kathleen Prince, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Leesona Corporation, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  4. Avins v. MollDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Oliver B. Cannon & Son, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1980

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API