Legal Opinion

Kinealy v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 4, 1963No. 49656PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSER, Commissioner.

Plaintiffs Harry and Lucile Kinealy, husband and wife, sued Southwestern Bell Telephone Company for loss of and damages to their land, claimed to have been caused by the cutting of ditches for underground telephone cables. Plaintiffs asserted ownership of two parcels of contiguous lands, Lots A and B, located on the south side of State Highway 21, where the highway crosses the Meramec River in St. Louis County. Lot A, the western boundary of which is the river and the northern boundary of which is the bridge right of way, is a pie-shaped wedge 1200 feet long and…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kimmie v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Brawley v. EsterlySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Curtis v. Fruin-Colnon Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Hunt v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  5. Brown v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Duke v. Gulf & Western Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Clifford Griggs v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  3. Barr v. Vickers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Smith v. CourterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. James v. Sunshine Biscuits, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API