Phillips v. Cutler
Supreme Court of Vermont
Appeal in Chancery. Heard on bill and answer and facts found by the chancellor in vacation after the September Term, 1915, Washington County, Fish, Chancellor. Decree for the plaintiff. Defendant appealed. The opinion states the facts. This case was before the Supreme Court at the May Term, 1915, on appeal by the plaintiff from a decree in favor of the defendant, and is reported in 89 Yt. 233. The decree was reversed pro forma and the cause remanded for further hearing.
Read the full summary
Appeal in Chancery. Heard on bill and answer and facts found by the chancellor in vacation after the September Term, 1915, Washington County, Fish, Chancellor. Decree for the plaintiff. Defendant appealed. The opinion states the facts. This case was before the Supreme Court at the May Term, 1915, on appeal by the plaintiff from a decree in favor of the defendant, and is reported in 89 Yt. 233. The decree was reversed pro forma and the cause remanded for further hearing. Additional testimony was taken and further facts found upon which a decree was entered for the plaintiff, from which this…
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
This is a bill in chancery. The case has before been here on an appeal from a decree dismissing the bill. We were not then content to dispose of the ease on the facts presented on the former hearing, and the decree dismissing the bill was reversed pro forma, and the cause was remanded for further proceedings in the court of chancery. 89 Vt. 233, 95 Atl. 487. Further proceedings were had, the same chancellor sitting as before, further findings were made, and a decree was rendered for the plaintiff. From this decree the defendant appeals.
The house of the plaintiff was purchased in 1848, by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clark v. GliddenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
- Phillips v. CutlerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
- Wheaton v. CutlerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
3Cited by1 opinion
- Valiquette v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936