Snyder v. Schmick
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 49, July T., 1894, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Lehigh Co., Jan T., 1890, No. 228, dismissing exceptions to appraisement for debtor’s exemption. Exceptions to appraisement for debtor’s exemption. From the record it appeared that Hannah Schmick, on March 5, 1890, executed a judgment note for $370 containing waiver of condemnation for purchase money of a house and lot of ground situate in Weisenburg township, Lehigh county.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 49, July T., 1894, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Lehigh Co., Jan T., 1890, No. 228, dismissing exceptions to appraisement for debtor’s exemption. Exceptions to appraisement for debtor’s exemption. From the record it appeared that Hannah Schmick, on March 5, 1890, executed a judgment note for $370 containing waiver of condemnation for purchase money of a house and lot of ground situate in Weisenburg township, Lehigh county. When judgment was entered the defendant owned an adjoining tract of land upon which this judgment also became a lien. On December 16,1893, execution was…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We find nothing in this record that would have justified the rejection of defendant’s claim to the $300 exemption, either on the ground that it was too late, or for other reasons suggested by plaintiff’s exceptions thereto. The sale was not delayed, nor were costs incurred that might have been avoided bj^ an earlier presentation of the claim. There was therefore no error in dismissing the exceptions and discharging the rule to set aside the appraisement. The questions presented by plaintiff’s exceptions have been sufficiently considered and properly disposed of in the opinion of…
2Cited by5 opinions
- H. G. Beetem & Co. v. GetzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Moore v. McMorrowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Breeding v. BreedingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1908
- Brown v. StroudSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1882
- Brown v. StroudSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1882