Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Ratliff

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1967No. 10604PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

19 Utah 2d 346 (1967)

431 P.2d 571

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MARY E. RATLIFF, DECEASED.

EARL McLAIN ET AL., AND FIRST SECURITY BANK OF UTAH, N.A., PLAINTIFFS AND RESPONDENTS,

v.

MAYBELLE R. CONRAD, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

No. 10604.

Supreme Court of Utah.

September 7, 1967.

Colton & Hammond, Beaslin, Nygaard, Coke & Vincent, Vernal, for appellant.

R. Earl Dillman, Roosevelt, Bruce T. Buell for Holland & Hart, Denver, Colo., for respondents.

CALLISTER, Justice:

This is a probate proceeding instituted on the petition of certain legatees named in the last will and testament of Mary E. Ratliff,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. Jacobsen v. JeffriesUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Drohan v. AvellarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. McLain v. ConradUtah Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Riverton CityUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Burgers v. MaibenUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Bigelow v. IngersollUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Peay v. PeayUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Tracy v. University of Utah HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API